Spear the Hedgehog wrote:I think it's flat out ignorant.
Though whenever social change happens in history, you usually polarize the conservative and liberal ideal sets until the liberal ideals become the norm.
These new progressive ideals will either completely die out, or they'll become the new conservative ideals. That's the funny thing about society, the conservative ideals of our time were the liberal ones of the past.....
I say just let it pass, if you attack them about it, it'll just fan the flames.
Silence is usually the best way to, well, get your way in this type of situation. Cultural isolation at it's best.
doomjazz wrote:ugh this makes me feel sick.
i just have to say that this is NOT representative of all Christians everywhere.
i also have to disagree with hedgehog - by silencing debate on issues, it makes it seem like this kind of behavour is "okay". attacking doesn't get you anywhere, but neither does not standing up for yourself.
Silence by cultural isolation is different than not standing up for yourself.
Silence can be just as effective. Though right now people tend to either go all rage mode, or they just take the beating.
The silence I'm talking about is the type our parents gave us as discipline, the "I'm disappointed in you" silence....
doomjazz wrote:Silence by cultural isolation is different than not standing up for yourself.
Silence can be just as effective. Though right now people tend to either go all rage mode, or they just take the beating.
The silence I'm talking about is the type our parents gave us as discipline, the "I'm disappointed in you" silence....
but sometimes people don't see silence as "disapproving" they see silence as meaning "there's no opposition to my behaviour, therefore i can keep doing it."
sometimes speaking up is necessary, or else nothing will change.

Remember the "Put them all behind an electrified fence" thing that happened last week or so?
doomjazz wrote:Remember the "Put them all behind an electrified fence" thing that happened last week or so?
the what now?!
i'm from down under, so i'm assuming this is in america...?
Ddraigeneth wrote:As for the song, I think the fact that it includes the word "ain't" speaks more than any political debate.
ColeDX wrote:I'm Catholic and I fully support gays, I don't even care if it's against God's will.
Ddraigeneth wrote:It took the US a hundred years to go from "Okay, you're not property" to "I guess you can have full rights as citizens." And that included mass protests, both peaceful and violent, along with an assassination bordering on martyrdom. Things will balance out eventually, but don't expect anything to happen overnight.
As for the song, I think the fact that it includes the word "ain't" speaks more than any political debate.
Someone on Mangafox wrote:majeh was a legendary swordsman...
but i haven't seen him fight with a sword...
all i've ever seen is him bitch-slapping his enemies to submission...
Sonic-ock wrote:Part gorilla dick


JoKeRcologne wrote:ColeDX wrote:I'm Catholic and I fully support gays, I don't even care if it's against God's will.
Well ...
Look in an anatomy book and check the inner organs of the lower parts of our bodies ...
there is a specific organ for male people which can be triggered in a different pleasurable way as usual sex can ever do.
For female people exist on the exact same place a different organ ...but it can be triggered in a similar way![]()
So facts are set up...
Now my question:
if God did not create this, than there must be evolution ...and Gods will is meaningless because not even nature listen to "it" ...right?
if God did create this ...why could this be against God's will ??
where in the Ten Commandments is it forbidden to love the same gender? couldn't find it.
Users browsing this forum: blankd and 5 guests